Changes

Jump to: navigation, search

Evaluation of Braze or Weld Joints

69 bytes added, 12:21, 21 September 2014
no edit summary
Typically the non-destructive testing of braze joints requires more elaborate test equipment. Besides this such test methods have limitations regarding the shape of the contact tips and/or carriers. The prevalent methods are ultrasound testing and X-ray analysis.
*Ultrasonic testing <br />This method is based on the disruption of the propagation of sound waves in different media. High resolution modern test systems with graphic print-out capabilities and analytical software are capable to detect even small (<0.5 mm diameter) voids in the braze joint. The portion of the wetted areas is calculated as a percentage of the whole joint area. <xr id="fig:Ultrasound print-out of braze joints"/> <!--(Fig. 3.15) --> shows an example of different braze qualities for a Ag/SnO<sub>2</sub> contact tip brazed to a copper carrier and illustrates the position and size of void areas as well as the final joint quality.<br />
<figure id="fig:Ultrasound print-out of braze joints">
[[File:Ultrasound print-out of braze joints.jpg|right|thumb|Ultrasound print-out of braze joints between Ag/SnO 88/12 tips and Cu carrier with 2
</figure>
Besides destructive testing for shear force and weld area the non-destructive ultrasound testing of the joint quality is also utilized for welded contact assemblies <xr id="fig:Ultrasonic picture of a weld"/> <!--(Fig. 3.16)-->.
=== Selection of Attachment Methods===
In the preceding sections a multitude of possibilities for the attachment of contact materials to their carriers was described. A correlation of these methods to the switching current of electromechanical devices is illustrated in <xr id="fig:Correlation between Contact Joining Methods and Switching Currents"/> <!--(Tab. 3.2)-->. It shows that for the same switching load multiple attachment methods can be applied. Which method to chose depends on a variety of parameters such as contact material, material combination of contact and carrier, shape of the contact, required number of switching operations and last but not least the required volume of parts to be manufactured.
Based on the end application the following can be stated as general rules: Electroplated contact surfaces are limited to switching without or under
[[File:Correlation between Contact Joining Methods and Switching Currents.jpg|right|thumb|Correlation between Contact Joining Methods and Switching Currents]]
</figure>
 
==References==
[[:Manufacturing Technologies for Contact Parts#References|References]]
 
[[de:Prüfung_von_Löt-_und_Schweißverbindungen]]

Navigation menu

Powered by